-
Recent Posts
- Call for Papers: Vanderbilt Law School Civil Justice Scholarship Workshop
- Prof. Coleman Posts The Vanishing Plaintiff on SSRN
- Harry Potter and the Trouble with Tort Theory
- Ninth Circuit Notes Intracircuit Split Re Compatability of Rule 23 Class Actions and Collective Actions under FLSA
- Oregon’s Miller Symposium Call for Papers
Recent Comments
Archives
Categories
- Administrative Law
- Affirmance Rates
- Agency
- Agency Rulemaking
- Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC)
- Appellate Courts
- Budget Deficits
- California
- Check-the-Box Regulations
- Children
- Civil Procedure
- Commensurability
- Congressional Committees
- Constitutional Law
- Cornell Law Review
- Criminal Law & Procedure
- criminology
- Decision Making
- Deregulation
- desert
- Detainees
- Dignity
- Disaster Law
- Discretionary Appeals
- Dissent Rates
- Due Process & Equal Protection
- Duke Law Journal
- Empirical Analysis
- Evidence
- Exclusive Legal Workshop Editorial
- Families
- Family & Personal Law
- Family Caps
- Federal Courts
- Fiscal Arbitrage
- Free Speech
- Game Theory
- Georgetown Law Journal
- Government speech doctrine
- Guantánamo Bay
- Human Rights
- Humanitarian Aid
- Hurricane Katrina
- Hurricane Katrina
- Instrumental Considerations
- insurance
- International Law
- International Law
- Interpersonal Comparisons
- Israeli Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Law & Economics
- Law & Politics/Social Science
- Law and Economics
- Law and Politics
- law and psychology
- Law Review Article
- Law Review Note
- Legal Ethics & Legal Practice
- Legal Philosophy & Critical Theory
- Legislative Process
- Lexical Order
- Mandatory Appeals
- Maximum Family Grant (MFG)
- Media
- Media
- Military Response
- military tribunal
- Model Penal Code
- Mohammed Jawad
- N.Y.U. Law Review
- Non-Transitivity
- Northwestern Law Review
- Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA)
- Police
- Police
- Political Transitions
- Post Type
- Poverty
- President Clinton
- preventive adjudication
- Privatization
- Professional Responsibility
- Property Law
- Property Rights
- Public Officials
- Public Policy
- Remedies
- Reversal Rates
- Risk Assessment
- Schools
- Separation of Powers
- Social Value
- Societal Decisions
- Stanford Law Review
- Tax Complexity
- Tax Law
- Tax Policy
- Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)
- Thought Experiment
- Topics
- Tort Law
- Torts
- Torture
- U. Chicago Law Review
- Uncategorized
- Welfare
- William and Mary Law Review
- Zero-Grant Situation
Meta
Category Archives: Stanford Law Review
Harry Potter and the Trouble with Tort Theory
Imagine that upon graduation from Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry, Harry Potter goes to law school. As a 1L, he takes torts from a professor with an economist’s view of the institution. She teaches Potter that tort law aims to minimize the sum of the costs of accidents and… Read More » Continue reading
Posted in Law & Economics, Law and Economics, Law Review Article, Stanford Law Review, Thought Experiment, Tort Law, Torts
Comments Off
Guns, Fruits, Drugs, and Documents: A Criminal Defense Lawyer’s Responsibility for Real Evidence
“My client came to my office with a loaded gun, burglar’s tools, and a stolen Picasso. These can each be traced to him through fingerprint evidence or in other ways. Theft of the Picasso is headline news, but police say they have no leads. What do I do now?”
A… Read More » Continue reading
Posted in Evidence, Law Review Article, Legal Ethics & Legal Practice, Professional Responsibility, Stanford Law Review
Comments Off